|
|
|
|
articles & white papers on Talent Retention & Team Building
http://www.theglobeandmail.comSeptember 9, 2005 HRLook.com Employees distrust senior management: StudyEmployees have a high level of distrust in senior management, according to a new survey by Mercer Human Resource Consulting. The survey of more than 1,100 British employees found that fewer than four in 10 employees trust senior managers to always communicate honestly. That was down from 39 per cent in 2002. The findings are similar to a recent Mercer survey in the United States, where just 40 per cent of employees trust management to communicate honestly. The survey also found that levels of trust decline with length of service. Fifty-seven per cent of employees with under a year's service trust management to communicate honestly, which falls to just 26 per cent for employees with 15 or more years. And just 53 per cent of respondents felt their organization does a good job of keeping employees informed about matters that affect them. Other findings: 48 per cent thought of respondents there is sufficient contact between managers and employees in their organization, while 58 per cent thought their manager does a good job of being available when needed. Chicago Tribune - Chicago,IL,USA Megan Waitkoff May 20, 2005 1st female `Apprentice' gets points for teamwork
ComputerWeekly.com - UK
Building team spirit to boost productivity
The link between staff who work closely in a team and a happy, productive
workplace has been recognised for decades. Tips for successful teamworking
Cincinnati Enquirer - Cincinnati,OH,USA By John Eckberg May 15, 2005 You build a team by building up the individualsIt is an old and tired phrase. But that does not stop Peewee football coaches, youth baseball coaches, idealistic mid-level managers and wordy assistant directors of market development from using it again and again and again: "Think about it," they say. Long pause. "There is no 'I' in team." And it's true - there's no I in team. Can't argue with that. But there is an M and there is an E and that's why many - if not most - people pose a silent question after being told they will now be one of a handful of people assigned to a team. What's in it for ME? The answer, more often than not, is frustration, discord and discontent, says Michael Finley, co-author with Harvey A. Robbins of "The New Why Teams Don't Work: What Goes Wrong and How to Make It Right" (Berrett-Koehler Publishers). "Teams are made up of people, and people are not naturally motivated by team goals," Finley said. "People are motivated by their own goals." What usually happens, Robbins said, is that something he calls "team tyranny" takes over whenever firms or company divisions have difficult or improbable tasks and so create a team. "Managers think everybody has to be on a team, whether it makes sense or not. They go: O ooooo, humans working together - cooooool. Cool idea." Except that humans are not cogs in a machine and they almost never smoothly mesh like gears, wheels, sprockets and sockets. Robbins has presented seminars about team building to about 100 groups of an estimated 100 people and done it each year for the last 10 years - that's 100,000 people. "Probably 75 percent of the people in the sessions will ask about and like the idea of teamwork, but they just can't figure out how to make them work," Robbins said. Here are some suggestions:
"Some people aren't attractive, and they want to be around attractive people, so they'll want to be part of the team," Robbins said. "Other people want to be around smart people, or they don't want to work hard and want to be around people who do work hard. "It's probably going to be stupid stuff like that."
"Analyticals want it in writing," Robbins said. "Expressives want the information while they're having a good time. We say buy them a T-shirt."
The smart team leader needs to understand that people are always going to have private agendas. "And to some degree, a smart team leader will allow those agendas to happen," Finley said. http://www.expresshotelierandcaterer.com Express Hotelier & Caterer - Mumbai,India May 16, 2005 by Gene Ference Is Your Team In V-Formation? Focus On TeamworkGeese fly in V-formation for aerodynamic efficiency. Is management and staff focused on reaching a common goal through teamwork? Employee satisfaction surveys can help in making sure teams stay focused and fly in V-formation to customer satisfaction. In nature, teams work together to more easily achieve common goals. Wolves hunt together in packs, forming a formidable force to be reckoned with when they surround and in unison, move in on their prey. They are much more efficient in a pack than is the proverbial lone wolf. Geese work together when in flight, taking turns as the leader when forming the familiar V-formation that aerodynamically cuts the air for more efficient flying. Even ants find better results through teamwork, whether in building nests or in finding the shortest route to food as they leave pheromones behind as they walk. As a result, ants that have found the shortest route to food leave behind more pheromones than those that have taken a longer route, effectively helping all of the following ants to take the shorter route. The same should be said for your property. Every employee should be focused on reaching a common goal through teamwork. They should have clearly defined responsibilities that management supports by identifying strengths of each team member. Team members should be selected to compliment one another by utilising their differing skills and experiences. During the team building process, associates' feedback, concerns and ideas are all important towards developing the team into a well-oiled machine. Semi-annual and/or annual employee satisfaction surveys can offer a wealth of knowledge and insight into these areas. Because the responses and resulting data are kept in strict confidence, the responses are therefore truthful and informative. HVS/The Ference Group and The Center For Survey Research has been providing the hotel industry with custom, detailed reports that have been data-mined from these surveys for over 20 years. Associates that network and perform as a team in order to respond to guest's needs allow managers more time to continue to upgrade the working environment and help celebrate successes. Managers that communicate their approval and let their team members know of the great job they are doing inspire their team to even greater heights. Developing their team through education and allowing them time to problem solve is an investment that pays dividends for both the individuals as well as the property. Making sure that recognition is fairly distributed and that the team is appreciated can be an extremely beneficial tool. Teams that have fun and enjoy their work will focus on yet higher goals and be more willing to get the job done, as opposed to employees that commit only to a humdrum existence of working their shift each day with no incentives in sight. If at all possible, throw a party, have an outing or invite your team for an informal get-together after work. Even if you can celebrate a team's success with pizza for lunch or a cake during a break, it is another positive reinforcement of the team effort and a building block to future successes. Once again, whether or not employees are recognised for the contributions they are able to make to the success of the property is a measurable survey question that can aid in furthering recognition and promoting teamwork. It is extremely important to find out what the team's perception of their efforts are and not rely only on what management thinks or looks at. Realising the shortfalls as well as the successes of the teams can initiate new and improved avenues of attack to acquiring a more satisfied and loyal guest. In a time when every customer is precious, when every hotel and casino is seeking a bigger piece of the pie, and when each property is looking to gain more loyalty in guests returning time and time again, the road to success may lie in the focus on teamwork. Individuals must work together within their department to wow the customer. Teams must work together between departments to present a seamless experience for each guest as well. Management must focus on supporting, improving, recognising and rewarding excellence in teamwork. Line staff must focus on using their strengths and developing a close-knit team that effectively takes care of each guests' needs. Both management and staff need to focus on celebrating success and having fun while reaching team goals. As in nature, when teams come together, they can offer a formidable force to be reckoned with. Finding that 'V-formation' that cuts through to service excellence and discovering the shortest route to your goals can provide limitless success to both individuals and to teams, and ensure that each property will not only survive in these challenging times, but prosper and grow.
Diversity in Team BuildingHow should we think about the importance of diversity, and how best to understand and value cultural differences? Diversity, the misunderstood child of the Age of Aquarius and Political Correctness, is an incredibly powerful tool for an organization. Diversity brings thoughts, feelings, and cultural knowledge that benefits decision making, marketing, operations, culture-building, hiring, firing—just about everything a business does. But its true power comes out only when diversity starts at the top and pervades the business. Alas, most businesses score dismally when it comes to understanding and using difference. In my experience, many diversity programs are really anti-harassment programs. Someone says something offensive about a different race, gender, religion, geographic origin, or sexual orientation. The diversity police jump in and mandate "diversity training." It's a good thing they jump in—inaction sends the wrong message and can bring big lawsuits—but the motivation and the training many times boils down to, "Don't say these things because people get upset." In really enlightened companies, diversity training happens before it's needed, so that first incident can be avoided, too. Don't get me wrong; diversity training can produce some effect. The true bigots who don't intend to change at least know now which conversations to save for behind closed doors. People who are ignorant but care will be able to change a bit. But don't expect much benefit beyond a decline in harassment. What is diversity?Diversity takes many forms. We mostly notice and legislate the visible stuff: people have different skin color, talk with different accents, wear different clothes, have different (dis)abilities, are different ages, have same-sex partners, practice different religions, and use different hands when they write. Most discrimination targets the visible stuff, and many anti-harassment programs help people understand that despite surface differences, deep down all people are worthwhile and valuable. Surface diversity is what we deal with when we wish to avoid problems. We teach people to value the person within. But it's the diversity within that brings great benefits. Inner diversity includes the Psych 101 stuff—different personality and work styles, brain dominance, etc. More subtly, it includes different thinking styles and different fundamental assumptions about the way the world works. The invisible diversities of culture, religion, value systems, etc., are where you can reap real business benefit. It's easy to assume outer diversity signals inner diversity and vice versa. Not necessarily. A professor once remarked within my earshot, "Never again will most of these students be somewhere with such diversity of race and geographic origin. And never again will they be somewhere with such uniformity of thought and attitude." Inner diversity gives the biggest bang for your buck. Personality and behavior style profiles are widely used to help groups identify and talk about inner differences. Not only can the distinctions help explain why people clash, but used in team building, they can help you balance the skills needed to finish a project. For example, one profile distinguishes "people people" from those who are task and process oriented. If you were designing a customer service call center, you would involve both profile types so your systems are efficient but also give a good interpersonal experience. Profiles can also help match people with jobs. Using profiles, some companies discover all top performers share common attributes. With that knowledge, they can do a better job matching. If Myers-Briggs ESTJs make the best salespeople for your organization, your chronically dissatisfied engineer whose profile is ESTJ may become a huge resource if given a chance in sales.
Cultural differences
and deep learning Cultural differences are where you discover the most basic assumptions that you've never even questioned. This causes problems; questioning deep assumptions can feel very threatening. So threatening, in fact, that reactions are defensive bordering on violent. But if you can manage the emotion and create a safe space to play "what if," you may find your thinking changes dramatically. A reader wrote in last month, "Americans work 50 percent more per week than people in my country and take four weeks fewer vacation, yet they don't get more done than we did in my country." America has cultural assumptions about working a lot and measuring it by face time. A foreigner can point out that there's another way. An American company that listens and learns might be able to offer six weeks of vacation and short hours to attract outstanding employees. (And I know of at least one company that has done this.) The Dalai Lama points out in his book The Art of Happiness that Eastern cultures believe in reincarnation. As such, they approach even daily tasks very differently. So I tried it (believing, that is, not reincarnating). Believing in future lives removes a lot of my daily stress in this one and also gives me a much longer-term time horizon. Suddenly, consuming my grandchildren's oil seems like a bigger deal, because those grandchildren might be me, reincarnated! A company that explores a reincarnation belief might end up taking a long-term view on their products. Seventh Generation does just that. They produce environmentally friendly household products. Their cultural source isn't reincarnation, however. The name refers to the Iroquois Confederacy practice of considering consequences seven generations out. Challenging an assumption doesn't automatically point to opportunity, but it's a start. Cultural differences can hint at new markets. Gloria Estefan recognized that the American music business is highly English-centric and has built her own business empire in America's Latin and Spanish-speaking populations—populations almost invisible in mainstream media. The wildly popular reality TV show, "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy," has helped the mainstream world enjoy "gay sensibility," with USA Today reporting (March 3, 2004) that sales for products mentioned on the show soar as much as 300 percent. Challenging an assumption doesn't automatically point to opportunity, but it's a start. A European colleague proposed hiring me to speak in his country. I asked, "Where should I stay? What are the good areas of town?" He was amused. "A very American question!" he proclaimed. "Have you ever considered a town might have only good areas?" Um, no. I never had. Even before our current fear-filled time, "bad areas of town" were a given. Knowing it's possible prompts me to ask how to make it happen. Is there a business there? I don't know. But an urban planning or civil engineering firm might find a few trips overseas could trigger some great ideas. Some of the ways to extract diversity's benefits:
"Comfy" diversity programs held for compliance reasons that skirt the real issues waste time and money. Your leadership challenge is to draw out the differences and help the group safely explore what those differences suggest about the business. You might find new opportunity, but either way, it's simply the right thing to do in an increasingly diverse workforce. It helps people feel valued and more worthwhile, and at the end of the day, why do we even have business if not to have more worthwhile, valuable lives? That's my underlying assumption, and if it isn't yours, your first diversity assignment is to try it on for size.
ITBusiness.ca - Canada 4/27/2005 by Vawn Himmelsbach Inco tries fresh approach to IT team buildingThe mining outfit creates relationships with toys and games
TORONTO – Inco Ltd. is one of the largest mining companies in the world, supplying 20 per cent of the planet’s nickel. While it’s primarily a nickel company, it also produces copper, precious metals, cobalt and sulphuric acid. And here were its top IT people from around the world, in a room with whiteboards and colourful markers, stuffed animals and music playing in the background. “My first reaction was, is this a daycare centre?” said Subi Bhandari, vice-president and chief information officer with Inco Ltd., when he first saw Capgemini’s Accelerated Solutions Environment (ASE). Capgemini officially opened its Toronto ASE Wednesday, one of about 20 ASEs around the world. The facility is designed for team building and collaboration exercises to help solve specific business problems. The traditional way to deal with these problems is to have one-hour meetings, every week, indefinitely. Not everyone shows up every week and very little actually gets accomplished. Inco is a highly distributed company, with operations spread from Sudbury, Ont., to the jungles of Indonesia. It has refineries in Japan, China and the U.K. And it had a problem: its IT personnel were located within each different business group, with no central leadership. To become more cost-effective, Bhandari said the company needed to come together as a group. For example, if an IT manager in Sudbury came up with a solution to a problem, it was unlikely that a person in the middle of the jungle in Indonesia would know about it or be able to make use of it. In a two-day session at the ASE facility, Bhandari brought together employees from as far away as Australia and Indonesia. While the concept behind the session sounds warm and fuzzy, he said it was less of a brainstorming session and more of a facilitated methodology. The goal was to establish a common understanding of its IT strategy and how that strategy was linked with business, focused on delivering more cost-effective IT services. As a result, it developed an IT transformation program, which is taking place over three to five years. It’s still in the transformation process, but has been able to fast track certain projects, as well as articulate its IT strategy to business managers. “This team (is) closer together despite geographic distances and time zones,” he said, stressing the importance of collaboration. Every two weeks, Bhandari holds a manager’s meeting via telephone and videoconferencing to find out what each IT department is working on. So far, it’s been able to consolidate its IT resources and budget for North America. The concept of collaboration is evolving from transactional-based collaboration to co-creation, according to Rob Evans, global ASE lead with Capgemini. The best example of co-creation, he said, is the iPod. This concept didn’t spring from Steve Job’s head, he said, but was the combined effort of several companies, including Apple, Sony and Toshiba. It took less than nine months to develop the iPod – a fact that flies in the face of the assumption that collaboration is too time-consuming, he said. “That’s not true in business today and it’s not true when you’re trying to create something new.”The ASE is designed to work on several levels: rational, emotional and political. “People don’t dislike change,” he said. “That’s why we buy new ties.” What they resist is the possibility of failure. Part of the philosophy behind the ASE is to bring large groups of people together, to get the politics out on the table and create a common culture. “It’s a purpose-built environment that’s peculiarly designed for collaborative work,” he said of the ASE.The process involves “scan, focus and act,” said Mads Jensen, Toronto ASE lead with Capgemini. Participants come up with ideas, test them, build models, rebuild those models and develop an action plan. This environment offers specific deliverables, he said, and takes traditional barriers out of the process. April 27, 2005 The more women in groups, the betterFill a team with women and you'll get the most creative and innovative results, a new study at the University of Toronto finds. "The more women participating equally in a project, the better the outcome," concludes Jennifer Berdahl, a business professor at the university's Rotman School of Management and lead author of a study published in the March issue of the journal Group Dynamics. Her research found that, while all teams begin with one person taking control early, groups of men tend to follow the lead of that dominant person throughout a project. Women, on the other hand, tend to share leadership roles and become more egalitarian as the work continues. "In a creative project team, it's really important to ensure there is equal opportunity for participation," Prof. Berdahl says. She and co-author Prof. Cameron Anderson of New York University examined the leadership behaviour of 169 students enrolled in Prof. Berdahl's organizational behaviour courses. Students were divided into three types of groups: work teams made up mostly of men, teams with equal numbers of men and women and teams that were predominantly female. Each group chose an organization to study, presented a proposal to the rest of the class and wrote a project paper. They also answered a questionnaire about their preferences for egalitarian or hierarchical structures in groups. The male-led teams with one dominant leader received poorer grades on their project, which involved coming up with an original approach to a problem and presenting an analysis of options. Mixed-sex teams in which a man dominated also scored worse than teams in which women were actively encouraged to share lead roles.
Scoop.co.nz (press release) - New Zealand
Placing more emphasis on high-performance teamsShould your business place more emphasis on building high-performance teams?
I would suggest that the first issue is recognising whether or not there is the need for team building within your company to improve motivation, morale and results. - or - should team-building exercises/strategies be part and parcel of every company agenda, regardless of the current climate within your business?
My conclusion is that the only thing successful companies has is a team of motivated and focussed people who see the exciting vision or goal for the business and are working for a company that cares about them and their career. It goes without saying that also they feel they are being fairly compensated.
There are three basic types of teams:
1.
Problem-solving.
People work together or not as the case maybe, depending on climate and motivation levels within the business. Just because they are in a group is no assurance that they will work as an effective team. If, as a business owner or team leader you do not recognise the following then it is likely that yours could be an under-performing business or team.
Personality.If you do not understand your own personality and the personality of those you are going to have in your team then you will not understand the most effective way to get the best out of the team. Personality tests are easy and inexpensive to administer.
Common goal.Have team members helped you to develop the goal of what you are trying to achieve? -- if they have, then they will be more likely to commit to implementing the goal. If the goal was just imposed on team members then chances are that it will be less likely to be achieved.
Resolving Conflicts.Do you currently have any unresolved conflicts? Unresolved conflicts destroy morale and trust. They become the undercurrent and they feed the grapevine. Make sure you resolve conflicts in a positive way, and remember to leave the egos of team members intact.
Communication.How active is the grapevine currently? An over-active grapevine probably means that there is not open communication and environment of mutual trust and respect. You cannot communicate too often, or in too many different ways in order to get the message across effectively. Teams go stale -- if you are putting people together on a longer-term project recognise that they may go stale. Build some short-term wins into the project and celebrate successes. On a long-term project you may need to consider rotating members off the team.
Job Security.If you bring a team together to solve problems or for a new venture then in all likelihood the team will achieve its purpose and disband. What will happen to team members when the task is complete? Will team members have a job at all, or will they be going to another department or part of your business? Team members will start to become anxious as the project nears completion and so I always sit down with each person 60-90 days before the end of the project in order help them plan their next career move. This may involve a discussion around helping them to find a new career path through recruiters or other companies within the same industry.
With large corporates there are obviously 'teams' at every level. By sheer weight of numbers of people in the organisation it means that it will be easier for non-team types (as opposed to disruptive personalities etc) to function in the large business setting.
In a small firm environment not only must each person pull their weight but it is critical that they all function as part of a team. In a larger firm setting it is more practical to have people working more autonomously. That said, it is virtually impossible to effectively grow a business without high-performing teams. The power of 2+2=5.
Typically I separate out whether or not the team will be one of close inter-dependant relationships, or a situation where, even though people may be part of a larger team they may not need to be actively participating team members. Good examples would be.
Close-knit team. A group of people in accounting processing jointly all customer monthly invoices and statements. Time-deadline, common task and a collective result.
Project team - say, building a bridge. Part of an overall team with a common goal but a range of individual tasks towards the team goal. Designers, engineers and then the actual bridge builders. Independent tasks with regular meetings on the overall project plan and task activity. In this case a lot more of independent work and thinking.
Once you determine whether you need a close-knit team or a team having just a common project goal you can then assess the personalities of prospective team members in order to determine if each person will be a good fit for the type of team you are setting up.
If you have a dysfunctional team right now chances are you have either unresolved conflicts or you do not understand, or have learned to work with the different personality types of team members.
Some people work for their personal love of the job; others work for personal fulfillment. Others like to accomplish goals and feel as if they are contributing to something larger than themselves, something important. Some people have personal missions they attain through meaningful work.
Others truly love what they do or the clients they serve. Some like the camaraderie and interaction with customers and co-workers. Other people like to fill their time with activity and just so they can pay the bills and do other things with their life. Some workers like change, challenge, and diverse problems to solve and others do not.
In my experience those persons committed to a career path will simply not stay for the pay check alone.
Not just
to have them remain with the company, but to deliver consistent over-the-top
business results or customer service requires staff to appreciate:
The Bangkok Post 21 April 2005 Teamwork is Key at Kimberly-Clark Thailand
|
|
|